Tobacco companies should be held responsible for the deaths and diseases from smoking

That being said, i do not think that tobacco companies should be held responsible for illnesses or death related to their products marketing is just a suggestion the person had to make a conscious decision to go to the store, purchase the product, and use it repeatedly. Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related illnesses and deaths what would a socially responsible tobacco company look like it could certainly not be defined as such if it did not address the harm its products cause. Tobacco companies, not the smoker, should be held responsible if smoking results in disease and deathnicotine is a highly addictive substance, and quitting it is a struggle for most smokers the government should take action to stop people smoking and should also take action against the tobacco companies. I think smoking companies should be responsible for smoking related deaths if something was wrong with the smokes eg food poisoning dangerous chemicals or different ingredients then the. Every year in the us, more than 480,000 people die from tobacco use and exposure to secondhand smoke, making it the leading cause of preventable death in this country tragically, each day thousands of kids still pick up a tobacco product for the first time find out how smoking and use of other.

tobacco companies should be held responsible for the deaths and diseases from smoking Tobacco producers should be held to the same environmental cleanup standards as other toxic waste products, according to a special communication published in tobacco control.

In the end the companies should not be held responsible and it is the consumers choice to use the product the companies are selling to the public. Tobacco companies should be held accountable for the deaths and illnesses caused by the use of their products smoking account for an estimated 443,000 deaths, or nearly one of every five deaths, each year in the united states, and nearly 5 million deaths worldwide. Smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the us, causing over 438,000 deaths per year secondhand smoke is a serious health hazard for people of all ages, causing more than 41,000 deaths each year.

Seavey replies: actually, about ten times as many people die from smoking-related illness each year in the us as from car accidents, and cars do not end up killing a significant fraction of their users, whereas about a third of smokers arguably die from their habit. Should businesses that sell products which are responsible for a huge numbers of deaths, illness and injury, such as tobacco and junk food, be held accountable and made to improve public health. The effects of tobacco #2 tobacco causes diseases such as lung cancer, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (copd), chronic bronchitis and emphysema and over 85 million americans are currently living with these diseases. 1- health (fatal illness, tobacco companies can be accountable for a great percentage of lung cancer and other diseases caused by tobacco secondhand smokers contribute to death toll, even if you don't smoke tobacco puts you at risk.

Should tobacco companies be held responsible for tobacco related illnesses or deaths answer questions colonoscopy showed clear but i have constant stomach pains and urges to go to the bathroom. A few years ago, some states forced the tobacco companies to pay outrageous settlements of multiple billions of dollars to help pay for tobacco education and health care to those suffering from the affects of smoking. Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths october 17, 2018 essay answers write an argumentative thesis, and support the thesis in a four- to six-paragraph argumentative essay. Yes, they should be held responsible points (why yes) 1- health (fatal illness, tobacco companies can be accountable for a great percentage of lung cancer and other diseases caused by tobacco. To the jury, the arguments were new, but to the defendant, r j reynolds tobacco company, they were the same issues that had been tried in dozens of suits: should reynolds, the nation's second.

3- social (socially wrong, tobacco was cool in former americans' society, widely published by every social media, magazines, television and movies, these media companies should be held accountable for tobacco's society spread and posterior fatal impact too. Sure tobacco companies make it even more addictive by adding ammonia and other chemicals to cigarettes, but younger smokers knew the risks when they started there's even a warning on the cigarette packet. Should tobacco companies be held responsible and liable for costs associated with lung cancer and other smoking-related illnesses (2005, september 05. - maxwell bell from lake forest was looking for should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related illnesses and deaths earl ellis found the answer to a search query should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related illnesses and deaths. In a 1989 gallup poll, only 16% of americans said tobacco companies should be held responsible for smokers' health problems, while 79% said they should not more than a decade later, gallup found relatively little change in this sentiment.

Tobacco companies should be held responsible for the deaths and diseases from smoking

So i would say no the tobacco companies should not be held liable and the smokers should not be held liable as well oh just as an after thought if smoking is banned as this is the way things are being steered. The tobacco companies should have made the dangers of smoking more clear to smokers neil bastiman, uk when i was a teenager, over 40 years ago now, the pressure to smoke was intense - and not just peer pressure either. I think smoking companies should be responsible for smoking related deaths if something was wrong with the smokes eg food poisoning dangerous chemicals or different ingredien ts then the.

  • Smoking is responsible for the death of one in ten adults worldwide (about 5 million deaths per year) and, if current smoking patterns continue, by 2030 the proportion will be one in six, about 10 million deaths per year (world bank, 1999.
  • Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related diseases - july 17th, 2013 it is also important to note that tobacco is not only risky to the smoker it is also damaging to anyone in the region within the parameter in which an individual inhales the smoke which is also recognized as second hand smokers.

Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths write an argumentative thesis, and support the thesis in a four- to six-paragraph argumentative essay. The only reason tobacco companies should and are being held responsible for smoking related illnesses and deaths is because the tobacco company executives lied to congress when they all stated before a congressional hearing that tobacco smoking was not addictive. The dangers of tobacco and the war on the distribution of the leading causes of death in america.

tobacco companies should be held responsible for the deaths and diseases from smoking Tobacco producers should be held to the same environmental cleanup standards as other toxic waste products, according to a special communication published in tobacco control. tobacco companies should be held responsible for the deaths and diseases from smoking Tobacco producers should be held to the same environmental cleanup standards as other toxic waste products, according to a special communication published in tobacco control. tobacco companies should be held responsible for the deaths and diseases from smoking Tobacco producers should be held to the same environmental cleanup standards as other toxic waste products, according to a special communication published in tobacco control. tobacco companies should be held responsible for the deaths and diseases from smoking Tobacco producers should be held to the same environmental cleanup standards as other toxic waste products, according to a special communication published in tobacco control.
Tobacco companies should be held responsible for the deaths and diseases from smoking
Rated 4/5 based on 25 review

2018.